Ticket #2916 (closed: fixed)

Opened 9 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

Reducer for OSIRIS Diffraction

Reported by: Michael Whitty Owned by: Nick Draper
Priority: major Milestone: Iteration 29
Component: Mantid Keywords:
Cc: Blocked By:
Blocking: #2574, #2929 Tester: Martyn Gigg

Description

Workflow:

  1. Load vanadium files (multiple files for multiple dSpacings)
  2. Load sample files (multiple files for multiple dSpacings)
  3. Identify which vanadium belongs with each sample file.
  4. Normalise by beam current (AlignDetectors first? Maybe?)
  5. Divide sample by vanadium.
  6. Output as GSS (How does SaveGSS deal with a grouped workspace?)
  7. Merge into a single file?

Doing it as a reducer would be more appropriate than just a script. Not sure how general I can make it though, not having seen the diffraction workflow for others.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

  • Blocking 2574 added

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

  • Blocking 2929 added

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

  • Status changed from new to accepted

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

(In [11313]) refs #2916 - reducer for OSIRIS diffraction with PythonAlgorithm to feed its inputs. work-in-progress, requires feedback from instrument scientist / reference result from arial.

comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

revision [11686] was also regarding this ticket. trac does not seem to have linked it.

comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by Michael Whitty

  • Status changed from accepted to verify
  • Resolution set to fixed

this is done.

comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by Nick Draper

  • Owner changed from Michael Whitty to Martyn Gigg

Moved from Michael Whitty, ask Martyn if you have any questions during testing

comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by Nick Draper

  • Owner changed from Martyn Gigg to Nick Draper

Moved so they can be tested

comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by Martyn Gigg

  • Status changed from verify to verifying
  • Tester set to Martyn Gigg

comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by Martyn Gigg

  • Status changed from verifying to closed

This exists and looks as if it is doing the steps suggested. It is not actually used anywhere yet though.

I feel we may be able to do better than creating a single reducer for one instrument but Michael said that they felt what they did was not going to be done anywhere else.

comment:11 Changed 5 years ago by Stuart Campbell

This ticket has been transferred to github issue ​3763

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.