Better Naming Conventions For Added Data

[Peter Parker]

#9429 highlighted two problems with the current naming conventions for added data:

• Adding runs using the "Add Runs" tab gives us files with names of the form "SANS2D00023626-add.nxs". This is a bad since we have no way of knowing exactly which runs it consists of -- it probably contains 23627, but does it also contain 23628, 23629 or 23630?

• We don't distinguish between having loaded 23626 and having loaded 23626-add when loading via the interface; in both cases the workspace containing the data will be called "23626_sans_nxs".

[Stuart Campbell]

This ticket has been transferred to github issue ​10403