Ticket #7003 (assigned)
Can we do better than the ugly Property::getUnmangledTypeName function
Reported by: | Martyn Gigg | Owned by: | Martyn Gigg |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Backlog |
Component: | Framework | Keywords: | Maintenance |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: | Tester: |
Description
This was a very dirty hack along time ago so that we had a consistent unmangled type string across platforms.
Visual Studio returns unmangled strings by default in type info & GCC offers access to a demangler function: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/ext_demangling.html
This of course may not then be consistent but it seems good enough for boost::python as that's what they use.
Change History
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by Nick Draper
- Owner set to Martyn Gigg
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by Martyn Gigg
- Milestone changed from Release 2.6 to Release 2.7
Batch move to 2.7
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.