Ticket #9174 (closed: fixed)
Add option to output additional info in PlotPeakByLogValue
Reported by: | Samuel Jackson | Owned by: | Samuel Jackson |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Release 3.2 |
Component: | Indirect Inelastic | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: | Tester: | Roman Tolchenov |
Change History
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by Samuel Jackson
- Status changed from assigned to inprogress
Refs #9174 Add additional options to PlotPeakByLogValue.
Changeset: 06d26552aacd8b61755242fe1a044b5a8f17df45
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by Samuel Jackson
Refs #9174 Add unit test for new options.
Changeset: b6d19f39658ad3aba44309d9898a850b8cb7df28
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by Samuel Jackson
Refs #9174 Add additional options to Fitting Dialog.
Changeset: d66604ef1e92e50f6e35933bad2a51bad67fbed2
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by Samuel Jackson
To Test:
I've added a couple of additional options to PlotPeakByLogValue, which allows us to get extra information about the fitting out for each spectrum. To test this you will need to:
- Check the unit and system tests are passing.
- Run PlotPeakByLogValue with a composite function with the additional options set to true.
- I've added a test script with an example.
- Check that the fit *_Workspace has 2 additional spectra called "LinearBackground" and "Convolution"
- Check that the new options available on the Sequential Fit dialog provide the same functionality as above, but through the GUI.
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by Samuel Jackson
- Status changed from inprogress to verify
- Resolution set to fixed
- Blocking 8739 removed
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by Roman Tolchenov
- Status changed from verify to verifying
- Tester set to Roman Tolchenov
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by Roman Tolchenov
- Status changed from verifying to closed
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/9174_plotpeak_additional_output'
Full changeset: 78bff9c6a0fcb131888421b82282a7c4576c3c43
comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by Stuart Campbell
This ticket has been transferred to github issue 10017
Sounds reasonable. Make sure you add full test instructions.